Merricks (2001) defends eliminativism about material objects such as baseballs and statues, but not persons. I argue that Merricks’s eliminativism about material objects is correct but must also extend to persons.

Lopes (2010) offers an account of computer art, which he argues is a new art form. Part of what makes computer art distinctive, according to Lopes, is its interactivity, a quality found in few non-computer artworks. Given the rise in prominence of such artworks, most notably videogames, they are surely worthy of philosophical inquiry. I believe their ontology and properties are particularly worthy of study, as an understanding of these will prove crucial to critical understanding and evaluation of the works themselves.